|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||
|
PD/A CRSP Nineteenth Annual Technical Report |
||
| Previous Section | Table of Contents |
Next Section |
Cite as: [Author(s), 2002. Title.] In: K. McElwee, K. Lewis, M. Nidiffer, and P. Buitrago (Editors), Nineteenth Annual Technical Report. Pond Dynamics/Aquaculture CRSP, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, [pp. ___.]
The goal of this study was to evaluate feeding strategies that could be used to reduce tilapia grow-out costs. Growth, yield, and survival of tilapia fed daily were compared at 100 and 67% of experimentally determined satiation. Analysis of growth performance parameters demonstrated that the reduction of rations to 67% of satiation had no effect on growth or yield, suggesting that this approach may be useful to farmers wishing to reduce costs without compromising sales.
The use of supplemental feed in addition to fertilization has improved tilapia yields economically. The availability of many types of commercial feeds has made it even more convenient for tilapia farmers to provide feed to their fish. But while feeding ensures rapid growth of fish, feed costs often demand 60 to 70% of the total production cost.
Feeding strategy can affect the profitability of a tilapia production operation. Good feeding procedures must be developed to minimize feed wastage and deterioration of water quality. In a tilapia feeding experiment in Thailand under the Pond Dynamics/Aquaculture Collaborative Research Support Program (PD/A CRSP), results showed that feeding at 50% satiation ration, coupled with fertilization, gave comparable growth and yield to full satiation and provided better water quality (Diana et al., 1994).
The amount of feeds provided is usually determined as some percentage of the body weight of the culture animals. In culture conditions where some natural food is available, 3 to 5% of the total weight of a crop is a reasonable rule of thumb for providing pellet food to finfish (Avault, 1996; Nwanna and Bolarinwa, 2001). Another feeding practice is to provide all the food the fish will consume to ensure that all individuals obtain sufficient nutrition during the grow-out period. However, this latter practice can be costly and may create water quality problems.
This study was undertaken to demonstrate efficient supplemental feeding strategies for tilapia production in fertilized ponds. Specifically, the study aimed to evaluate growth, yield, and survival of tilapia fed daily at 100 and 67% of experimentally determined satiation. This experiment, conducted in cooperation with farmers in the central area of Luzon Island, also served to test the applicability of a reduced-feeding strategy under commercial tilapia aquaculture conditions in the Philippines.
Nine tilapia farmers participated in this trial. At each participating farm site, two ponds were assigned one of each of the two treatmentsfeed ration at 100 and 67% of experimentally determined satiation levels. The determination of satiation requirements was made once a week on each farm by the project staff. The fish were given prepared feeds consisting of 67% rice bran and 33% fish meal (crude protein = 28.6%).
The pond size ranged from 0.1178 to 0.40 ha. The ponds were stocked with sex-reversed Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) of the Genetically Improved Farm Tilapia (GIFT) strain. This strain is genetically selected for rapid growth and presently distributed by the GIFT Foundation International, Incorporated. Fingerlings with mean weight of 0.05 g were used at a stocking rate of 4 fish m-2.
All ponds were fertilized weekly with urea and ammonium phosphate at a rate of 28 kg N and 5.6 kg P ha-1 wk-1. Water depth was maintained at 1 m.
Water quality parameters were monitored monthly in all ponds. The water was analyzed for dissolved oxygen, pH, total alkalinity, total ammonia, and soluble reactive phosphorus. Analyses were done according to standard methods (PD/A CRSP, 1992).
A sample of 50 fish was obtained from each pond every month to measure average weights of the fish. After 120 days the ponds were harvested by seining and then complete draining. Total number of fish was counted and bulk-weighed. Final mean weight, daily weight gain, gross yields, and survival rates were calculated. The total amount of feed given in each treatment was also estimated at the end of the study. Growth performance was analyzed statistically by t-tests.
Growth performance data are presented in Table 1. Initial stocking weight of the fish was similar in all farm sites. At harvest there were no significant differences observed in the final mean weights, daily weight gains, fish yields, extrapolated gross yields, and survival between the two satiation levels tested (P > 0.05).
Mean body weights measured at monthly intervals are shown in Figure 1. A higher mean final body weight of fish was observed in the 67% satiation than in the 100% satiation; however, the difference was not significantly different (P > 0.05). A better feed conversion ratio was obtained in the fish fed at reduced satiation level (2.38) than in those fed at full satiation (3.40).
The total feed given to the full satiation treatment was 9,396kgha-1 as opposed to 7,801 kg ha-1 in the reduced ration. This reduction in the amount of feed resulted in $399 savings in terms of feed costs (Table 2). The survival rate can be considered moderate, but there was also no evidence that this was treatment-related. Mortality could be due to handling stress at stocking and during regular sampling of the fish.
This is the second experiment concluded under the current work plan in which a demonstrable reduction in operating costs is not accompanied by a reduction in fish yields. Farmers have adopted the methods demonstrated in the first part of our project (9FFR4, "Timing of the onset of supplemental feeding of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in ponds") and will in all likelihood find the reduction of the ration to provide another viable cost-reduction option for them. The pattern that is developing is one of a number of methods being made available to minimize the cost of feeding tilapia grown in ponds in the Philippines. It seems likely that many conscientious farmers are reluctant to compromise their feeding schedules in the interest of growing fish rapidly and keeping them as healthy as possible. Our results indicate that reducing feeding rates, either by delaying the introduction of feeds (9FFR4) or by feeding less than the amount required for satiation (this investigation), does not cause any statistically detectable difference in pond yields or fish quality. We would predict that farmers will find this welcome and reassuring news. We anticipate that a significant number of tilapia farmers in Central Luzon will adopt and to some extent adapt this technique for their own applications, realizing some cost savings in the process.
We wish to acknowledge the support of the farmer-collaborators who willingly made their pond facilities available for this study. This research was supported by the PD/A CRSP. The Philippine Phosphate Fertilizer Corporation is acknowledged for providing part of the chemical fertilizers used in this study.
Avault, J.W., Jr., 1996. Fundamentals of Aquaculture: A Step-by-Step Guide to Commercial Aquaculture. AVA Publishing Company, Inc., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA, 889 pp.
Diana, J.S., C.K. Lin, and K. Jaiyen, 1994. Supplemental feeding of tilapia in fertilized ponds. J. World Aquacult. Soc., 25(4):497506.
Nwanna, L.C. and T.O. Bolarinwa, 2001. Determination of optimum feeding rate for Oreochromis niloticus fingerlings. Book of AbstractsAquaculture 2001, World Aquacult. Soc., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA, p. 482.
Pond Dynamics/Aquaculture Collaborative Research Support Program, 1992. Handbook of Analytical Methods. Pond Dynamics/Aquaculture CRSP, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
| Previous Section | Table of Contents |
Next Section |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Pond Dynamics/Aquaculture CRSP is funded under USAID Grant No. LAG-G-00-96-90015-00
and by
the participating US and Host Country institutions.
Questions for or about the Aquaculture CRSP? Comments about this site? Email ACRSP@oregonstate.edu.
Disclaimers